How accurate is the score?

Every check is based on what Google and the AI providers document publicly, and title widths are measured in pixels the way Google displays them. The score is a guide to how well-prepared a page is – no tool can guarantee rankings, because Google also weighs links, competition and many other signals.

Do you store my website's content?

No. We fetch the page like a search engine would, analyse it and keep only the finished report in a short-lived cache for an hour so repeat views are fast.

Is there a limit on how many sites I can check?

Not for normal use. The instant tools run in your browser and are unlimited. Full checks and audits only have a safety limit set far above what a person can use by hand (two checks a minute, every minute), plus a cap on how often any one website can be checked – that stops bots using XKey to flood other people's sites.

Do I need to give my email address?

No. XKey never asks for an email, an account or card details – not even for weekly monitoring, which gives you a private link instead.

Can I download my SEO report without signing up?

Yes. Use "Print or save as PDF" at the bottom of any report. The website audit also gives you a PDF and a CSV of every page, with no sign-up.

Can I check a competitor's website?

Yes – any public website. To see your site and up to two competitors side by side, use the competitor comparison.

Why is my score different from other SEO checkers?

Each tool weights different checks. XKey gives extra weight to things that stop a page appearing at all (indexing, titles, H1) and adds AI search readiness, which most checkers don't measure yet.

SEO report: bit-tech.net scores 69/100

Fix these first

Title tagcritical
“The UK's leading source for Hardware and Games reviews | bit-tech.net”
Fix: Write a unique title of roughly 50–60 characters with the main search phrase first.
Preview and measure your title with the free title tag checker
Read the guide: how to write title tags
See the details
H1 headingcritical
No H1 heading.
Fix: Use one H1 that states the page topic with its main keyword.
See the details
XML sitemaphigh
No XML sitemap found at /sitemap.xml or in robots.txt.
Fix: Create an XML sitemap listing every page and submit it in Google Search Console.
Make one with the free XML sitemap generator
Read the guide: XML sitemaps
See the details
www / non-wwwmedium
Both www.bit-tech.net and bit-tech.net load without redirecting – Google may see duplicate sites.
Fix: Pick one version (with or without www) and 301-redirect the other to it.
See the details
Question-led contentmedium
No headings phrased as questions.
Fix: Add headings that match real questions ("How much does…?") followed by a direct one- or two-sentence answer – an easy format for search and AI answers to quote.
Read the guide: how to write SEO content
See the details
Freshness signalsmedium
No published/updated date found.
Fix: Show a 'last updated' date and add dateModified to your structured data.
See the details
Trust pages (E-E-A-T)medium
Links found to about; missing contact and privacy.
Fix: Link to About, Contact and Privacy pages from every page – they help visitors, Google and AI tools see who stands behind the content.
See the details
Imagesmedium
50 image(s).
Fix: Give every image width and height, lazy-load images below the fold (but not the main image) and serve WebP/AVIF.
Read the guide: image SEO
See the details

Check the whole website

This report covers one page. The full-site audit crawls up to 250 pages to find broken links, duplicate titles, orphan pages and more.

Run a full-site audit

Monitor this site weekly

We'll re-check it every week and track the score, with a history graph and a list of anything that breaks.

Compare with competitors

See how this page scores against up to two competitors, side by side, and where they beat you.

Compare sites

Real-world speed Google PageSpeed

Loading Core Web Vitals from Google… this can take up to 30 seconds.

Authority & backlinks

Looking up which websites link to bit-tech.net…

Indexing & crawling 79%

Can search engines reach, read and index this page?

✓
Status codecritical
The page returned HTTP 200.
✓
Indexablecritical
No noindex instruction – the page can appear in search.
✓
robots.txthigh
robots.txt found.
Googlebot is allowed to crawl this page.
✗
XML sitemaphigh
No XML sitemap found at /sitemap.xml or in robots.txt.
Fix: Create an XML sitemap listing every page and submit it in Google Search Console.
Make one with the free XML sitemap generator
Read the guide: XML sitemaps
✓
Canonical URLhigh
Canonical: https://bit-tech.net/
Points to this page (self-referencing).
✓
Redirectshigh
Loads directly with no redirects.
✗
www / non-wwwmedium
Both www.bit-tech.net and bit-tech.net load without redirecting – Google may see duplicate sites.
Fix: Pick one version (with or without www) and 301-redirect the other to it.

Content quality 47%

Is there enough clear, useful text that matches what the page targets?

✓
Word countmedium
743 words of main content (menus and footer excluded).
Google has no minimum word count – this is a rough guide to whether the page answers the question in full.
✓
Readabilitymedium
Flesch reading ease 67 (plain English), about 10 words per sentence.
!
Topic focushigh
5 of 8 title keywords appear in the main content (missing: leading, source, hardware).
Fix: Use your main title phrases naturally in the opening paragraph and headings.
Find the phrases people search with the free keyword generator
Read the guide: how to write SEO content
✗
H1 headingcritical
No H1 heading.
Fix: Use one H1 that states the page topic with its main keyword.
!
Heading structuremedium
30 headings for 743 words – a lot for the amount of text.
Levels are in order.
Fix: Use H2s for main sections and H3s inside them, without skipping levels.
Read the guide: the on-page SEO checklist
!
Text-to-code ratiolow
6% of the HTML is visible text.
Fix: Trim unused markup, inline scripts and builder bloat.

AI search readiness 56%

Can ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews read, understand and cite this site?

✓
AI crawler accesshigh
Search and AI-search crawlers (Googlebot, Bingbot, OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot…) can read this page.
✓
Snippet controlshigh
No snippet restrictions – search and AI answers can quote this page.
✗
llms.txtlow
No /llms.txt file. It's an optional, emerging convention – few AI tools are confirmed to read it yet, so this is low priority.
Fix: Optionally add /llms.txt: a short Markdown summary of who you are with links to your key pages.
Make one with the free llms.txt generator
Read the guide: do you need llms.txt?
✗
Question-led contentmedium
No headings phrased as questions.
Fix: Add headings that match real questions ("How much does…?") followed by a direct one- or two-sentence answer – an easy format for search and AI answers to quote.
Read the guide: how to write SEO content
✓
Entity clarityhigh
Identified as: Organization.
4 official profile link(s) (sameAs).
✗
Freshness signalsmedium
No published/updated date found.
Fix: Show a 'last updated' date and add dateModified to your structured data.
✗
Trust pages (E-E-A-T)medium
Links found to about; missing contact and privacy.
Fix: Link to About, Contact and Privacy pages from every page – they help visitors, Google and AI tools see who stands behind the content.

Structured data 100%

Machine-readable facts for rich results and AI.

✓
JSON-LD present & validhigh
1 JSON-LD block(s): Organization, ImageObject.
All blocks parse correctly.
✓
Required propertiesmedium
Key types include Google's required properties.
i
Breadcrumbslow
Home page – breadcrumbs not needed.

Links 100%

Internal linking, anchor text and broken links.

✓
Internal linkinghigh
70 internal and 16 external links.
✓
Anchor text qualitymedium
No link text points to two different pages.
✓
Broken links (sample)high
Checked 12 internal link(s).
No broken links found.

Performance 53%

Speed signals from the HTML and server. Real-user Core Web Vitals load below.

!
Server response (TTFB)high
902 ms until the first response from our checker, including connection setup (Google rates TTFB good under 0.8 s, poor over 1.8 s).
Fix: Use page caching or a CDN (e.g. Cloudflare) so HTML is served from the edge.
✓
HTML sizemedium
74 kB of HTML.
✓
Compressionmedium
Compressed with gzip.
!
Render-blocking resourceshigh
1 blocking script(s) and 3 stylesheet(s) in <head>.
Fix: Add defer to scripts, inline critical CSS and load the rest asynchronously.
Read the guide: Core Web Vitals
!
Scripts & third partiesmedium
12 script tag(s); files loaded from 0 other domain(s).
Fix: Remove unused tracking and widget scripts; every third party adds connection time.
Read the guide: Core Web Vitals
✗
Imagesmedium
50 image(s).
50 without width/height – can cause layout shift (CLS).
35 image(s) after the first three aren't lazy-loaded.
0 use WebP/AVIF or responsive srcset.
Fix: Give every image width and height, lazy-load images below the fold (but not the main image) and serve WebP/AVIF.
Read the guide: image SEO
✗
Cachinglow
No Cache-Control header.
Fix: Set Cache-Control so browsers and CDNs can reuse the page.
i
HTTP/3low
Couldn't be confirmed from our server – the alt-svc header that advertises HTTP/3 isn't always visible to it. Your site is on Cloudflare, which offers HTTP/3 under Network settings.

Security 75%

Visitor safety signals that browsers and Google check.

✓
HTTPScritical
Secure HTTPS with no mixed content.
✓
HTTP → HTTPS redirecthigh
http:// redirects to https://.
✗
HSTSmedium
No Strict-Transport-Security header.
Fix: Add Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains.
Read the guide: the technical SEO checklist
✗
Security headerslow
Present: clickjacking protection.
Fix: Add X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy and X-Frame-Options (or a CSP).
Read the guide: the technical SEO checklist
✓
Server fingerprintlow
No X-Powered-By header (server: cloudflare).

Mobile & accessibility 83%

Usable on phones and by everyone – Google indexes the mobile version.

✓
Mobile viewportcritical
viewport: width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0
✓
Image alt textmedium
All 50 images have alt text.
✗
Form labelsmedium
1 of 4 form field(s) have no label.
Fix: Give every form field a <label> or aria-label (a placeholder isn't a label).
✓
Link nameslow
Every link has a readable name.
✓
Tap-to-contactmedium
One-tap contact: email.

Local SEO not scored

This site doesn't look like a local business, so these checks are shown for information and not scored.

i
LocalBusiness markuphigh
No LocalBusiness structured data.
✓
Contact details on pagemedium
No phone number found.
No postcode found (fine for service-area businesses).
An email link is shown.
i
Map & directionslow
No map or directions link.

This report checks one page. Scores are a guide, not a guarantee of rankings. Check another page · Print or save as PDF

SEO report for bit-tech.net

Fix these first

Real-world speed Google PageSpeed

Authority & backlinks

Indexing & crawling 79%

Status codecritical

Indexablecritical

robots.txthigh

XML sitemaphigh

Canonical URLhigh

Redirectshigh

www / non-wwwmedium

Search snippet & sharing 58%

Title tagcritical

Meta descriptionhigh

Open Graph & social cardsmedium

Faviconlow

Languagelow

Content quality 47%

Word countmedium

Readabilitymedium

Topic focushigh

H1 headingcritical

Heading structuremedium

Text-to-code ratiolow

AI search readiness 56%

AI crawler accesshigh

Snippet controlshigh

llms.txtlow

Question-led contentmedium

Entity clarityhigh

Freshness signalsmedium

Trust pages (E-E-A-T)medium

Structured data 100%

JSON-LD present & validhigh

Required propertiesmedium

Breadcrumbslow

Links 100%

Internal linkinghigh

Anchor text qualitymedium

Broken links (sample)high

Performance 53%

Server response (TTFB)high

HTML sizemedium

Compressionmedium

Render-blocking resourceshigh

Scripts & third partiesmedium

Imagesmedium

Cachinglow

HTTP/3low

Security 75%

HTTPScritical

HTTP → HTTPS redirecthigh

HSTSmedium

Security headerslow

Server fingerprintlow

Mobile & accessibility 83%

Mobile viewportcritical

Image alt textmedium

Form labelsmedium

Link nameslow

Tap-to-contactmedium

Local SEO not scored

LocalBusiness markuphigh

Contact details on pagemedium

Map & directionslow